A Brief Theology Of Church And Personal Security

With the recent event in Texas, this takes on increased relevance.

Prov. 22:3: "A prudent person foresees danger and takes precautions..."

One of the hot button topics of our day is the idea of allowing firearms carry – concealed or otherwise - in churches. For some, this represents the ultimate expression of paranoia. After all, the church is the one place where one should feel safe. For others, the idea of allowing firearms in the church seems to fly in the face of implicit trust in God for our protection.

And yet, while Jesus did in fact teach that there are circumstances under which we turn the other cheek, there is a Biblical basis for armed church and personal security.

Going back to the Old Testament, 1 Chronicles 9 details the decision made jointly between King David and the Prophet Samuel to establish a temple guard corps, a select group of men entrusted with the physical security of the tabernacle (and later, the temple), its treasuries, and its utensils. This task was so important that King David reassigned his most trusted guards, the Korahites, from their duties guarding his palace to the protection of the temple. These men guarded the entrances of the House of God to insure both the sanctity of the meeting place and the security of those taking part in the worship activities. They accounted for the utensils used in the worship ceremonies, checking them in and out each day. They guarded the treasury and foodstuffs. So while God is ultimately responsible for the defense of His house, David and Samuel recognized that we live in a fallen world in which God expects us to take those actions that are consistent with security and protection. This is a principle laid out in Proverbs: "The prudent sees danger and hides himself, but the simple go on and suffer for it." A literal translation of the term, "hides", indicates covering one's self, taking those steps that are consistent with protecting one's self from impending trouble or danger.

OK, but that was the Old Testament. The New Testament tells us to turn the other cheek. Again, this is true - to a point.

As was stated earlier, Jesus did teach that there are circumstances under which turning the other cheek is the most appropriate response. But the same Jesus who gave this teaching also COMMANDED His disciples to arm themselves for their own protection.

Luke 22 gives the account of the hours preceding the crucifixion of Jesus, specifically, the time He spent in the Garden of Gethsemane immediately preceding His arrest. An interesting exchange took place between Jesus and His disciples in verses 35-36:

"And he said to them, "When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?"
 They said, "Nothing."
 He said to them, "But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one."

Notice what isn't - and then what is - covered here.

Jesus began by reminding the disciples that when He sent them out on an earlier missionary quest, everything was to be provided for them by God (Matt. 10:5-10). They were to take nothing with them - no money, knapsack, sandals. Not even their staves. This is significant. The staff wasn't just to assist them in traversing the rugged terrain, it was also a means of defense. The reformer John Knox was known to have been a master of the staff, and he is reputed to have laid out a number of highwaymen during his years of travel. But for the disciples, for their first quest, everything was completely in the hands of God.

With Jesus’ impending death, however, something changed. I don't claim to fully understand why the change was necessary; God is still, ultimately, the one who provides everything, including protection, for us. I simply acknowledge that something changed. As Jesus readied the disciples to live in a world in which He was no longer physically present with them, He gave them a new mandate - with one significant addition. Going forward, they were to make provision for funding, clothing, shoes -- and personal protection, a sword. This last addition was so important that Jesus, the same one who taught us to turn the other cheek at times, COMMANDED His disciples to sell their cloaks if necessary to provide it; the implication seems to be that it was better to be cold than unprotected. His COMMAND had nothing to do with forestalling or repelling His impending arrest and death; the soldiers were already on their way at that moment. and swords weren’t readily obtained by going to the local marketplace. It is significant to note that two of His disciples were already carrying swords prior to his admonition to obtain them (verse 38, “They said, ‘Lord, look, here are two swords.’”), and there is no evidence that Jesus EVER reprimanded them for doing so. Jesus understood that He was sending His disciples into a fallen world that was going to go from bad to worse, and that, while God is ultimately in control, there is still a human responsibility to provide for our own defense.

Is God ultimately the one who provides our protection? Absolutely. Did God entrust human government with the responsibility of providing a level of protection? Again, the answer is yes. Romans 13 teaches this clearly. And yet, none of this negates our personal responsibility to provide for the protection of ourselves, our families, and our churches. So while human government continues to diminish the level of protection it provides (no fewer than TEN US Supreme Court decisions affirm that law enforcement has no legal obligation to protect individuals, that their obligation is to society as a whole, and that security is a PERSONAL OBLIGATION), more of that responsibility falls on the individual. Thankfully, we live in a country whose Constitution explicitly recognizes that God has granted us the right to defend ourselves. The right protected by our Constitution to bear arms in our own defense is consistent with the command given by Jesus Himself.

The "Gun Free Zones" Lie....